Reasons to buy robotic system for spraying



1) Improve Quality:
With a robotic spray painting arm, you can expect to create a more reliable, high-quality end product. The consistency and thoroughness offered by a robotic spray-painting arm is unparalleled. The robotic spray gun always remains at the proper distance away from the target object. Painting robots provide excellent accessibility, coating hard-to-reach areas with ease.

2) Conserve Paint:
A robotic spray painting arm can cut material costs considerably. Reliable and precise, it doesn't overspray. The amount of paint used for any given part is consistent.

3) Play it Safe:
Painting is often tedious, repetitive work. Workers risk exposure to harmful toxins including VOCs, insocyanates, and carcinogens. With a robotic spray painting arm, workers no longer have to endure the strain and hazards associated with this job. In the end, companies with painting robots spend less on safety concerns (i.e. protective gear, health insurance).

4) Make Room:
Robots are well-suited for high-density paint booth layouts. Whether shelf, wall, or rail-mounted, paint robots offer compact workcell solutions. Robots are designed to work in close proximity to each other and other equipment. Companies not only save floorspace, but they can also achieve faster cycle times and better accessibility with creative robot placement.

5) Save Energy:
Spray painting booths require a carefully maintained atmosphere. The air inside the booth must be regulated and replaced constantly. Incinerators are necessary for burning up carcinogens in the air that is removed. Robotic spray painting robots allow for more compact booths, so the controlled environment is minimized, saving energy.

Workers to run robots

Anthony Nix knew what he wanted to learn, so he recently combined an industrial mechanics major with an automated manufacturing minor at Spartanburg Community College.
The result is the type of skills that five Upstate technical colleges are now pushing with the creation of TechReadySC and a new mechatronics curriculum that will be uniform across the colleges.

Mechatronics is an effort to combine mechanics, electronics, electrical systems and control systems into the skills that one technician would possess and is part of the technical college system's mission to "build a more competitive work force in the Upstate," said Wendy Walden, Greenville Technical College spokeswoman.

But the program is designed to do more.
It also is an attempt to expose middle and high school students and make their parents aware of a highly skilled, well-paid career that still labors under the perception that it is a dirty, greasy job, said Cynthia Eason, vice president for corporate and economic development at Greenville Tech and chair of TechReadySC.
"Fewer young people are selecting manufacturing as a career" at the time that baby-boomer employees are getting close to retirement, she said. "Our mechatronics will develop the skills needed for 21st century manufacturing and help keep the area competitive globally."

Nix, who graduated early this month and now works at Spartanburg Steel keeping the plant robotics running, agreed the need for workers with mechatronics skills is big and is growing.
"In most plants, maintenance work is divided between mechanics and electricians," he said. "That's not feasible any more. Now, the need is for people who can do both. The more skills you have, the more valuable you are to the company."
He's not alone in that perspective.

Donald Ryerson, human resources manager at Capsugel, said his company fields mechanical, maintenance and electrical workers. While at the announcement of the new program Wednesday, he said, "What excited me is the possibility of combining skills. This program has the potential to pull all these people together."

He said Capsugel's technology -- and its need for multi-skilled workers -- is "changing at the speed of light," and the company would like to hire technicians with multiple skills.
"We have a mature process," he said, "but we are asked to do more in less time with fewer people" -- a feat that requires skilled employees keeping the machinery running.

Bobby Hitt, BMW Manufacturing Co.'s manager of public relations, agreed.
He told those attending the announcement that BMW's body shops are 90 percent to 95 percent automated. The Greer plant, which daily makes about 660 vehicles worth $30 million to $35 million retail, can't afford for machinery to go down.

Every hour that a machine is shut down, the plant loses $1 million, he said.

Machinery "has to work all the time," he said.

The job of keeping the machinery operating at top productivity is a "sophisticated job" garnering high wages up to $100,000 or more, he said. It's also a career open to women as well as men.
Marvin Tedder, automation training specialist at Spartanburg Community College, said beginning wages are in the $18 to $22 an hour range at most area companies, but wages can soar with experience and talent.

"Every manufacturer needs these technicians," he said, adding they are among the least likely to be affected by general layoffs.

In fact, these jobs are among the least boring and best paid in a plant, said Steven Davis, senior engineer and facilities services supervisor with Velux, a maker of skylight.
His company currently does all its training in house, he said.

"It's been kind of a disconnect," he said, because the company couldn't find employees with the needed skills. Their maintenance technicians need robotics, controls and electrical skills -- which costs the company about $2,000 in training. In fact, the Danish company has brought technicians from Europe to work on machinery when necessary.

The idea of the technical colleges bringing mechatronics short courses to plant sites is a good idea because it can be difficult for maintenance technicians to find the necessary time for training, said Lynn Smith, corporate training coordinator for Velux.

This type of multi-skilled maintenance technician is more evident in other countries, Ryerson said, adding that the United States is lagging the more high-tech countries by 10 years or so.
Needed work force skills are changing, and mechatronics is an attempt to address the different skills needed, Eason said. The Southeast is one of the nation's fastest growing regions, and manufacturing is at the center of that growth, she said.

Despite having an assembly line that is 90 to 95 percent automated, the BMW plant in Greer has one of the largest work forces in the Upstate.

In addition, manufacturing jobs are good jobs, said Dan Davidchik, mechatronics project coordinator at Central Community College in Nebraska. Wages are 20 percent higher than those in other sectors. Two-thirds of U.S. exports are manufactured products. Manufacturing carries out more than 60 percent of U.S. research and development.

"Manufacturing is the engine that drives the American economy," he said, adding that without changes in the skills employees have that a shortage of between 13 million and 15 million skilled workers will exist by 2020.

And all types of employers need those skills, said David Beard, vice president of AdvanceSC and Milliken and Co.'s director of energy services.

"As you ride up and down I-85 and you see a pre-fabricated building that says sheet metal or pipe fitting, those guys are just as high tech as the BMW, Michelin and Millikens, the big boys," he said.
With $2.5 million in grants from AdvanceSC, a philanthropic arm of Duke Energy, the mechatronics is designed to meet the needs of area employers. It has included not only the creation of the curriculum but professional development for faculty members. Several have been to Germany and more will study there this summer, Eason said.
Beard said the mechatronics courses would need to continually bring in new technology -- not just annually but every semester, even daily.

The program eventually could be expanded beyond the current five schools, which include Greenville Tech, Piedmont Technical College, Spartanburg Community College, Tri-County Technical College and York Technical College, to other interested technical colleges in the state.

IFR International Conference on Robotics





WhenSep 23, 2010 - Sep 25, 2010
WhereCluj-Napoca, ROMÂNIA
Submission DeadlineFeb 1, 2010
Notification DueMar 15, 2010
Final Version DueMar 31, 2010



The 2010 IFR International Conference on Robotics (ROBOTICS'10) will take place in Cluj-Napoca, Romania, from September 23 to September 25, 2010. An ancient city (the first documental attestation comes up from the times of Roman Empire), Cluj-Napoca is situated in the Northwestern part of Romania. The capital of Cluj county, Cluj-Napoca, with nine public universities, is an important pole of research and higher education in Romania. As the host city of ROBOTICS'10, Cluj-Napoca not only provides the attendees with a great venue for this event, but also a distinctive and unique experience in the Romanian history and culture. You are cordially invited to join us at ROBOTICS'10. The main goal of ROBOTICS'10 is to provide a forum for researchers, educators, engineers, and government officials involved in the general areas of robotics, automation, mechatronics, to disseminate their latest research results and exchange views on the future research directions of these fields. 

We are looking for original, high-quality contributions addressing (but not limited) the following scientific and technological topics: 

Robotics, 
Mechanical design of robot architectures, 
Sensors and actuators in robotics, 
Mobile robots navigation and obstacle avoidance, 
Mechatronics, 
Industrial automation, process control, manufacturing process and automation, 
Micro and nano robots, parallel robots, 
Artificial intelligence, intelligent control, neuro-control, fuzzy control and their applications, 
Control system modeling, simulation techniques and methodologies, 
Biomedical and rehabilitation engineering, prosthetics and artificial organs, 
Teleoperation, telerobotics, haptics, and teleoperated semi-autonomous systems, 
Robotics for automobile production, 
Virtual reality.

Military robot

Military robots are autonomous robots or remote-controlled devices designed for military applications.


Soviet TT-26 teletank, February 1940 Military robots are autonomous robots or remote-controlled devices designed for military applications.
Such systems are currently being researched by a number of militaries


History


Broadly defined, military robots date back to World War II and the Cold War in the form of the German Goliath tracked mines and the Soviet teletanks. The MQ-1 Predator drone was when "CIA officers began to see the first practical returns on their decade-old fantasy of using aerial robots to collect intelligence".

Armed Predator drone.
The use of robots in warfare, although traditionally a topic for science fiction, is being researched as a possible future means of fighting wars. Already several military robots have been developed by various armies.

Some believe the future of modern warfare will be fought by automated weapons systems. The U.S. Military is investing heavily in research and development towards testing and deploying increasingly automated systems. The most prominent system currently in use is the unmanned aerial vehicle (IAI Pioneer & RQ-1 Predator) which can be armed with Air-to-ground missiles and remotely operated from a command center in reconnaissance roles. DARPA has hosted competitions in 2004 & 2005 to involve private companies and universities to develop unmanned ground vehicles to navigate through rough terrain in the Mojave Desert for a final prize of $2 Million. The field of artillery has also seen some promising research with an experimental weapons system named "Dragon Fire II" which automates the loading and ballistics calculations required for accurate predicted fire, providing a 12 second response time to artillery support requests. However, weapons of warfare have one limitation in becoming fully autonomous: there remain intervention points which requires human input to ensure that targets are not within restricted fire areas as defined by Geneva Conventions for the laws of war.

There have been some developments towards developing autonomous fighter jets and bombers. The use of autonomous fighters and bombers to destroy enemy targets is especially promising because of the lack of training required for robotic pilots, autonomous planes are capable of performing maneuvers which couldn't otherwise be done with human pilots (due to high amount of G-Force), plane designs don't require a life support system, and a loss of a plane doesn't mean a loss of a pilot. However, the largest draw back to robotics is their inability to accommodate for non-standard conditions. Advances in artificial intelligence in the near future may help to rectify this.


Examples


In development


The combat version of the Foster-Miller TALON, SWORDS.

XM1219 Armed Robotic Vehicle-Assault-Light (ARV-A-L) based on the MULEVehicle.
  • US Mechatronics has produced a working automated sentry gun and is currently developing it further for commercial and military use.


  • MIDARS, a four-wheeled robot outfitted with several cameras, radar, and possibly a firearm, that automatically performs random or preprogrammed patrols around a military base or other government installation. It alerts a human overseer when it detects movement in unauthorized areas, or other programmed conditions. The operator can then instruct the robot to ignore the event, or take over remote control to deal with an intruder, or to get better camera views of an emergency. The robot would also regularly scan radio frequency identification tags (RFID) placed on stored inventory as it passed and report any missing items.


  • Tactical Autonomous Combatant (TAC) units, described in Project Alpha study 'Unmanned Effects: Taking the Human out of the Loop' -
  • Autonomous Rotorcraft Sniper System is an experimental robotic weapons system being developed by the U.S. Army since 2005. It consists of a remotely operated sniper rifle attached to an unmanned autonomous helicopter. It is intended for use in urban combat or for several other missions requiring snipers. Flight tests are scheduled to begin in Summer 2009.


  • The "Mobile Autonomous Robot Software" research program was started in December 2003 bythe Pentagon who purchased 15 Segways in an attempt to develop more advanced military robots. The program was part of a $26 million Pentagon program to develop software for autonomous systems.



Foster-Miller TALON SWORDS units equipped with various weaponry.


Effects and impact


Advantages

Major Kenneth Rose of the US Army's Training and Doctrine Command outlined some of the advantages in robotic technology in warfare: "Machines don't get tired. They don't close their eyes. They don't hide under trees when it rains and they don't talk to their buddies ... A human's attention to detail on guard duty drops dramatically in the first 30 minutes ... Machines know no fear."
Increasing attention is also paid to how to make the robots more autonomous, with a view of eventually allowing them to operate on their own for extended periods of time, possibly behind enemy lines. For such functions, systems like the Energetically Autonomous Tactical Robotare being tried, which is intended to gain its own energy by foraging for plant matter.


Potential risks

In 2009, academics and technical experts attended a conference to discuss the impact of the hypothetical possibility that robots and computers could become self-sufficient and able to make their own decisions. They discussed the possibility and the extent to which computers and robots might be able to acquire any level of autonomy, and to what degree they could use such abilities to possibly pose any threat or hazard. They noted that some robots have acquired various forms of semi-autonomy, including being able to find power sources on their own and being able to independently choose targets to attack with weapons. They also noted that some computer viruses can evade elimination and have achieved "cockroach intelligence." They noted that self-awareness as depicted in science-fiction is probably unlikely, but that there were other potential hazards and pitfalls.
Some experts and academics have questioned the use of robots for military combat, especially when such robots are given some degree of autonomous functions. The US Navy has funded a report which indicates that as military robots become more complex, there should be greater attention to implications of their ability to make autonomous decisions.